Vol 7, No 2 (2017)
- Year: 2017
- Published: 28.09.2017
- Articles: 8
- URL: https://onco-surgery.info/jour/issue/view/25
Full Issue
10
ORIGINAL REPORTS
The choice of optimal lymph node dissection extent in surgical treatment for colon cancer: protocol the clinical trial
Abstract
Background. The choice of the best surgical approach to colon cancer treatment remains a complicated and controversial problem of modern coloproctology. Current data shows better long-term outcomes after procedures performed in accordance with embryological layers and concept of complete mesocolic excision, while level of vessel ligation remains debatable. In the US and Europe D3 lymph node dissection is not routinely performed for colon cancer, while in eastern countries it is considered to be a standard. Up-to-date there is no published data from randomized trials comparing long-term outcomes of D2 and D3 dissection. Materials and methods. A literature review was performed to evaluate current data on colon cancer lymph node dissection. A design of ran-domized trial was proposed to obtain the evidence on the superiority of D3 over D2 lymph node dissection. Discussion. As evidence regarding long-term outcomes of D3 lymph node dissection is lacking the choice of lymph node dissection is made according to surgeon’s or clinic preferences. Conclusion. To objectify the preferred lymph node dissection extent randomized controlled studies are needed.
11-19
Survival analysis for complicated colorectal cancer
Abstract
Introduction. Emergency surgical interventions for complicated colorectal cancer (CCRC) are characterized by high frequency of postoperative complications and mortality, as well as worse prognosis, compared to planned interventions. The study objective is to evaluate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with CCRC who underwent emergency surgery in specialized and general surgical in-patient facilities. Materials and methods. An electronic database (registry) includes data on 1098 patients with urgent complications of colorectal cancer who underwent treatment in general surgical and specialized in-patient facilities in Smolensk in 2001–2013. Depending on the specialty of an in-patient facility, all patients were divided into 3 groups: coloproctological (n = 352), oncological (n = 69), general surgical (n = 677) in-patient facility. Results. The percentage of R1-resections in general surgical in-patient facilities was 22.3 %, examination of 12 or more lymph nodes was performed only in 11.4 % of cases. Patients with CCRC who underwent surgery in general surgical in-patient facilities didn’t receive adjuvant treatment in 55.5 % of observations. OS and RFS were higher in CCRC patient groups who underwent surgery in an oncological dispensary or department of coloproctology compared to general surgical facilities (p <0.0001). The type of surgical intervention significantly affected survival: OS and RFS were higher after multi-stage surgeries with tumor removal at the 2>nd stage compared to other types of surgical interventions (p < 0.0001). Conclusion. Analysis of OS and RFS demonstrates that oncologically adequate surgical interventions are performed in specialized in-patient facilities.
20-29





