<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Surgery and Oncology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Surgery and Oncology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Хирургия и онкология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-5857</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">92</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/2220-3478-2013-0-3-56-62</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL REPORTS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ ОПЫТ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ МЕДИКАМЕНТОЗНЫХ ПРЕПАРАТОВ ПРИ ПОДГОТОВКЕ К КОЛОНОСКОПИИ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tereshchenko</surname><given-names>S. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Терещенко</surname><given-names>С. Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Endoscopy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение эндоскопии</p></bio><email>atitaeva@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Velikanov</surname><given-names>E. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Великанов</surname><given-names>Е. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Endoscopy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение эндоскопии</p></bio><email>atitaeva@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lukina</surname><given-names>E. M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лукина</surname><given-names>Е. М.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Endoscopy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение эндоскопии</p></bio><email>atitaeva@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Titaeva</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Титаева</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Endoscopy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение эндоскопии</p></bio><email>atitaeva@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mechеva</surname><given-names>L. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мечева</surname><given-names>Л. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Endoscopy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение эндоскопии</p></bio><email>atitaeva@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ МО «Московский областной научно-исследовательский клинический институт  &#13;
им. М.Ф. Владимирского»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-09-27" publication-format="electronic"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>56</fpage><lpage>62</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2015-03-01"><day>01</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2015-03-01"><day>01</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2013, Tereshchenko S.G., Velikanov E.V., Lukina E.M., Titaeva A.A., Mechеva L.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2013, Терещенко С.Г., Великанов Е.В., Лукина Е.М., Титаева А.А., Мечева Л.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Tereshchenko S.G., Velikanov E.V., Lukina E.M., Titaeva A.A., Mechеva L.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Терещенко С.Г., Великанов Е.В., Лукина Е.М., Титаева А.А., Мечева Л.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/92">https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/92</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Bowel preparation remains an important issue despite vast clinical experience in this field.</p><p>Methods. 530 patients were included in retrospective analysis. 234 (44.2 %) patients in group 1 used sodium phosphate (SP) for bowel preparation, 176 (33.2 %) patients in group 2 used polyethylene glycol (PEG), 120 (22.6 %) patients used castor oil. Quality of bowel preparation was assessed according to following grading system: «good», «acceptable», «bad».</p><p>Results. «Good», «acceptable», «bad» bowel preparation was observed in following number of patients: 160 (68.4 %), 46 (19.7 %) and 28 (12 %) patients who used SP, 38.6, 40.3 and 20.1 % who used PEG and 43.3, 20.8, 35.8 % who used castor oil. Results of «good» preparation were significantly better in patients who used SP comparing to other treatment groups.</p><p>Conclusions. Better bowel preparation with SP was observed in our study, though results need to be validated in randomized trials.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p/></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>colonoscopy</kwd><kwd>bowel preparation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Колоноскопия</kwd><kwd>подготовка кишечника</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Никифоров П.А., Виноградова Н.Н., Анохина Л.Н. и др. Возможности гастроинтестинальной эндоскопии в диагностике рака желудка и толстой кишки в условиях активной диспансеризации. Кремлевская медицина 2000;1:57–60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никифоров П.А., Виноградова Н.Н., Анохина Л.Н. и др. Возможности гастроинтестинальной эндоскопии в диагностике рака желудка и толстой кишки в условиях активной диспансеризации. Кремлевская медицина 2000;1:57–60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Князев М.В., Коробкин С.В. Подготовка толстой кишки к эндоскопическому исследованию препаратом Дюфалак. Клин эндоскопия 2005;3:1–3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Князев М.В., Коробкин С.В. Подготовка толстой кишки к эндоскопическому исследованию препаратом Дюфалак. Клин эндоскопия 2005;3:1–3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Поддубный Б.К., Мазуров С.Т., Карман С.Н. и др. «Применение препарата Дюфалак (лактулозы) для подготовки толстой кишки к колоноскопии у онкологических больных. Клин эндоскопия 2005;2:29–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поддубный Б.К., Мазуров С.Т., Карман С.Н. и др. «Применение препарата Дюфалак (лактулозы) для подготовки толстой кишки к колоноскопии у онкологических больных. Клин эндоскопия 2005;2:29–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Beck D.E., Fazio V.W., Jagelman D.G. Comparison of oral lavage methods for preoperative colon cleansing. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29(11):699–703.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beck D.E., Fazio V.W., Jagelman D.G. Comparison of oral lavage methods for preoperative colon cleansing. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29(11):699–703.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Brunelle R.L, Haves R.H., Lehman G.A., Mieler R.E. Comparative efficacy of colon cleansing methods: standard preparation versus colimmac lavage. Am J Roenthgenology 1984;142(2):309–10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brunelle R.L, Haves R.H., Lehman G.A., Mieler R.E. Comparative efficacy of colon cleansing methods: standard preparation versus colimmac lavage. Am J Roenthgenology 1984;142(2):309–10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Hendricks J., Frasee R.C., Roberts J. et al. Prospective, randomized trail of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35(3):223–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hendricks J., Frasee R.C., Roberts J. et al. Prospective, randomized trail of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35(3):223–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Oberlin P. Mechanical preparation of bowel for surgery. Enemas versus whole–gat lavage. A multicenter controlled study. Coloproctology 1986;8(5):296–9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oberlin P. Mechanical preparation of bowel for surgery. Enemas versus whole–gat lavage. A multicenter controlled study. Coloproctology 1986;8(5):296–9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Rey J., Delmotte J., Gorce D. et al. Efficacy and safety of an oral standart electrolytes solution (FORTRANS®) compared to a sodium phosphate solution (FLEET® PHOSPHO–SODA)) in the preparation of patient for colonoscopy.Citation: Endoscopy 2003;35(Suppl II)A117.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rey J., Delmotte J., Gorce D. et al. Efficacy and safety of an oral standart electrolytes solution (FORTRANS®) compared to a sodium phosphate solution (FLEET® PHOSPHO–SODA)) in the preparation of patient for colonoscopy.Citation: Endoscopy 2003;35(Suppl II)A117.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Schanz S., Kruis W., Mickisch O. et al. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage: A Multicenter Trial. Diagn Ther Endosc 2008;2008:713521.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schanz S., Kruis W., Mickisch O. et al. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage: A Multicenter Trial. Diagn Ther Endosc 2008;2008:713521.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. van Vugt van Pinxteren M.W., van Kouwen M.C., van Oijen M.G. et al. A prospective study of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution versus sodium phosphate in Lynch syndrome: a randomized trial. Fam Cancer 2012;11(3):337–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">van Vugt van Pinxteren M.W., van Kouwen M.C., van Oijen M.G. et al. A prospective study of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution versus sodium phosphate in Lynch syndrome: a randomized trial. Fam Cancer 2012;11(3):337–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Juluri R., Eckert G., Imperiale T.F. Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:38.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Juluri R., Eckert G., Imperiale T.F. Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:38.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
