<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Surgery and Oncology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Surgery and Oncology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Хирургия и онкология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-5857</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">838</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/2949-5857-2025-15-3-75-81</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL REPORTS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Results of surgical treatment of patients with cancer of the pancreatic body and tail and invasion of the celiac trunk</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Результаты хирургического лечения больных раком тела и хвоста поджелудочной железы с инвазией чревного ствола</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8893-1894</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Abgaryan</surname><given-names>М. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Абгарян</surname><given-names>М. Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mikael Grantovich Abgaryan</p><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Микаэл Грантович Абгарян</p><p>115522 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><email>abgaryan.mikael@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-1346</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Patyutko</surname><given-names>Yu. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Патютко</surname><given-names>Ю. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>115522 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-0549</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kotelnikov</surname><given-names>А. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Котельников</surname><given-names>А. Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>115522 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-9234</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Faynshteyn</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Файнштейн</surname><given-names>И. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>115522 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5229-8203</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Stilidi</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стилиди</surname><given-names>И. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>115522 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н. Н. Блохина» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-09-03" publication-format="electronic"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>81</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-09-03"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-09-03"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, ABV-press</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, АБВ-пресс</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">ABV-press</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">АБВ-пресс</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://onco-surgery.info/jour/about/editorialPolicies</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/838">https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/838</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Aim</bold>. To demonstrate relative safety, marked pain releif effect and satisfactory long-term results of surgical treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail with invasion of the celiac trunk in the form of distal subtotal pancreatic resection (DSPR) with resection of the celiac trunk.<bold>Materials and methods</bold>. The retrospective study included patients with cancer of the pancreatic head and tail with invasion of the celiac trunk who underwent DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk at the N . N . Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology in 2001–2023. Surgical complications were evaluated per the Clavien–Dindo classification. At the preoperative stage, angiography was performed to thoroughly evaluate the condition of the collateral system between the superior mesenteric and common hepatic arteries. According to the criteria we developed during this study, patients with undeveloped collaterals underwent preoperative embolization of the common hepatic artery with metallic spirals preserving blood flow through the gastroduodenal artery. Considering patients’ complaints of local pain of varying intensity at hospitalization, we evaluated their pain syndrome using the V isual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after surgical treatment.<bold>Results</bold>. DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery was performed in 32 patients. In 8 (25 %) of them, due to undeveloped arterial collaterals between the systems of the superior mesenteric and hepatic arteries, 7–14 days prior to surgery embolization of the common hepatic artery was performed with preservation of blood flow through the gastroduodenal artery. In 18 (56.25 %) patients, superior mesenteric and / or portal veins invaded by the tumor were resected along with the celiac trunk. In 84.4 % of cases, the volume of surgical treatment was R0; in 9.4 % of cases, R1; in 6.2 % of cases, R2. Frequency of histologically confirmed invasion of the celiac trunk was 78.1 %, magistral veins 72.2 %, perineural invasion 90.6 %. A correlation (r = 0.55; р = 0.001) between the presence of perineural invasion and local pain at the preoperative stage was observed. Mean pain syndrome intensity per VAS in patients with perineural invasion was 7.3 points which was significantly (р = 0.000001) higher than in patients without perineural invasion (2.7 points). DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk and nerve dissection relieved pain syndrome in all patients. Complications after DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk were observed in 17 (53.1 %) patients, in 14 (43.7 %) their severity was grade III or higher per the Clavien–Dindo scale. Mortality was 6.3 %. Oneand 2‑year survival of patients with locally advanced ductal carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail after DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk were 65.2 and 10.2 %, respectively, median overall survival was 15 months, maximal lifespan was 57 months. One- and 3‑year survival without signs of progression was 46.2 and 8.8 %, respectively, median progression-free survival was 9.9 months.<bold>Conclusion</bold>. DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery is relatively safe, allows to relieve pain syndrome with significant improvement in the quality of life of the patients, and promotes longer survival.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Цель исследования</bold> – показать относительную безопасность, выраженный обезболивающий эффект и удовлетворительные отдаленные результаты хирургического лечения больных протоковым раком тела и хвоста поджелудочной железы (ПЖ) с инвазией чревного ствола в объеме дистальной субтотальной резекции ПЖ (ДСРПЖ) с резекцией чревного ствола.<bold>Материалы и методы</bold>. В ретроспективное исследование включены больные раком тела и хвоста ПЖ с инвазией чревного ствола, которым в НМИЦ онкологии им. Н. Н. Б лохина в 2001–2023 гг. выполнили ДСРПЖ с резекцией чревного ствола. Осложнения хирургического вмешательства оценивали по шкале Clavien–Dindo. На дооперационном этапе по данным ангиографии проводили комплексную оценку состояния коллатеральной системы между верхней брыжеечной и общей печеночной артериями. Согласно критериям, разработанным нами в ходе данного исследования, пациентам с неразвитыми коллатералями провели предоперационную эмболизацию общей печеночной артерии металлическими спиралями, сохранив кровоток по желудочно-двенадцатиперстной артерии. С учетом жалоб всех пациентов при поступлении в клинику на локальную боль различной интенсивности мы оценили выраженность болевого синдрома по общепринятой визуально-аналоговой шкале до и после хирургического лечения.<bold>Результаты</bold>. ДСРПЖ с резекцией чревного ствола и общей печеночной артерии провели 32 больным. Восьми (25 %) из них в связи с неразвитыми артериальными коллатералями между бассейнами верхней брыжеечной и печеночной артерий за 7–14 дней до операции провели эмболизацию общей печеночной артерии металлическими спиралями, сохранив кровоток по желудочно-двенадцатиперстной артерии. У 18 (56,25 %) больных одновременно с чревным стволом резецировали верхнюю брыжеечную и / или воротную вены, инвазированные опухолью. В 84,4 % случаев выполнили хирургическое вмешательство в объеме R0, в 9,4 % – в объеме R1, в 6,2 % – в объеме R2. Частота гистологически верифицированной инвазии чревного ствола составила 78,1 %, магистральных вен – 72,2 %, периневральной инвазии – 90,6 %. Выявлена корреляция (r = 0,55; р = 0,001) между наличием периневральной инвазии и локальной боли на дооперационном этапе. Средняя оценка интенсивности болевого синдрома по визуально-аналоговой шкале у пациентов с периневральной инвазией составила 7,3 балла и достоверно (р = 0,000001) превысила оценку больных без периневральной инвазии (2,7 балла). ДСРПЖ с резекцией чревного ствола и нейродиссекцией способствовала купированию болевого синдрома у всех пациентов. Осложнения после ДСРПЖ с резекций чревного ствола возникли у 17 (53,1 %) больных, у 14 (43,7 %) пациентов тяжесть осложнений соответствовала III классу и выше по шкале Clavien–Dindo. Летальность составила 6,3 %. Одно- и 2‑летняя общая выживаемость больных местно-распространенным протоковым раком тела и хвоста ПЖ после ДСРПЖ с резекцией чревного ствола составили соответственно 65,2 и 10,2 %, медиана общей выживаемости – 15 мес, максимальная продолжительность жизни – 57 мес. Одно- и 3‑летняя выживаемость без признаков прогрессирования заболевания – 46,2 и 8,8 % соответственно, медиана выживаемости без прогрессирования – 9,9 мес.<bold>Вывод</bold>. ДСРПЖ с резекцией чревного ствола и общей печеночной артерии относительно безопасна, позволяет купировать болевой синдром, значительно улучшая качество жизни пациентов, и способствует увеличению продолжительности их жизни.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>pancreatic cancer</kwd><kwd>resection of the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery</kwd><kwd>embolization of the common hepatic artery</kwd><kwd>pain syndrome evaluation using VAS</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак поджелудочной железы</kwd><kwd>резекция чревного ствола и общей печеночной артерии</kwd><kwd>эмболизация общей печеночной артерии</kwd><kwd>оценка болевого синдрома по визуально-аналоговой шкале</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Mayumi T., Nimura Y., Kamiya J. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 1997;22(1):15–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02803900</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mayumi T., Nimura Y., Kamiya J. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 1997;22(1):15–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02803900</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Klompmaker S., de Rooij T., Korteweg J.J. et al. Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2016;103(8):941–9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10148</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klompmaker S., de Rooij T., Korteweg J.J. et al. Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2016;103(8):941–9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10148</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Yamamoto T., Satoi S., Kawai M. et al. Is distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Multicenter surgical group study. Pancreatology 2018;18(1):106–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yamamoto T., Satoi S., Kawai M. et al. Is distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Multicenter surgical group study. Pancreatology 2018;18(1):106–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Liu L., Liu T.-X., Huang W.-X. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body/ tail cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2022;45(1):51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.002</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu L., Liu T.-X., Huang W.-X. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body/ tail cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2022;45(1):51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.002</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Clavien P.A., Sanabria J.R., Strasberg S.M. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992;111(5):518–26. PMID: 1598671</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clavien P.A., Sanabria J.R., Strasberg S.M. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992;111(5):518–26. PMID: 1598671</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Nakao A., Takagi H. Isolated pancreatectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma using catheter bypass of the portal vein. Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40:426–9. PMID: 8270230</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nakao A., Takagi H. Isolated pancreatectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma using catheter bypass of the portal vein. Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40:426–9. PMID: 8270230</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Aitken R.C. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969;62(10):989–93. DOI: 10.1177/003591576906201005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aitken R.C. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969;62(10):989–93. DOI: 10.1177/003591576906201005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Bassi C., Marchegiani G., Dervenis C. et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017;161(3):584–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bassi C., Marchegiani G., Dervenis C. et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017;161(3):584–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Kondo S., Katoh H., Omi M. et al. Radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery, plexus, and ganglions for advanced cancer of the pancreatic body: a preliminary report on perfect pain relief. JOP 2001;2(3):93–7. PMID: 11870330</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kondo S., Katoh H., Omi M. et al. Radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery, plexus, and ganglions for advanced cancer of the pancreatic body: a preliminary report on perfect pain relief. JOP 2001;2(3):93–7. PMID: 11870330</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Hirano S., Kondo S., Hara T. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):46–51. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000258608.52615.5a</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hirano S., Kondo S., Hara T. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):46–51. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000258608.52615.5a</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Gong H., Ma R., Gong J. et al. Distal pncreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Medicine 2016;95(10):e3061. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003061</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gong H., Ma R., Gong J. et al. Distal pncreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Medicine 2016;95(10):e3061. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003061</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Hishinuma S., Ogata Y., Tomikawa M., Ozawa I. Stomachpreserving distal pncreatectomy with combined resection of the celiac artery: radical procedure for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. J Gastroint Surg 2007;11(6):743–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0143-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hishinuma S., Ogata Y., Tomikawa M., Ozawa I. Stomachpreserving distal pncreatectomy with combined resection of the celiac artery: radical procedure for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. J Gastroint Surg 2007;11(6):743–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0143-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Jing W., Zhu G., Hu X. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2013;60(121):187–90. DOI: 10.5754/hge12499</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jing W., Zhu G., Hu X. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2013;60(121):187–90. DOI: 10.5754/hge12499</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Zhou Y.-M., Zhang X.-F., Li X.-D. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for pancreatic body-tail cancer: Is it justified? Med Sci Monit 2014;20:1–5. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.889847</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhou Y.-M., Zhang X.-F., Li X.-D. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for pancreatic body-tail cancer: Is it justified? Med Sci Monit 2014;20:1–5. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.889847</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Hirano S., Kondo S., Tanaka E. et al. Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection. Dig Surg 2010;27(3):212–6. DOI: 10.1159/000265573</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hirano S., Kondo S., Tanaka E. et al. Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection. Dig Surg 2010;27(3):212–6. DOI: 10.1159/000265573</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Nakamura T., Hirano S., Noji T. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (modified appleby procedure) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: a single-center review of 80 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(S5):969–75. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5493-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nakamura T., Hirano S., Noji T. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (modified appleby procedure) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: a single-center review of 80 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(S5):969–75. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5493-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
