<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Surgery and Oncology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Surgery and Oncology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Хирургия и онкология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-5857</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">530</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-1-58-66</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>LITERATURE REVIEW</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Paraaortic and pelvic lymph node dissection in the combined treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer with isolated lymph node lesion: a literature review</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Парааортальная и тазовая лимфодиссекция в комбинированном лечении рецидива рака яичников с изолированным поражением лимфатических узлов: обзор литературы</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-7905</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Egenov</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Егенов</surname><given-names>О. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p> 23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia </p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 23 </p></bio><email>egenov.omar@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-7473</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Tjulandina</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тюляндина</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p> 23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia </p><p>8–2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 23 </p><p>Россия, 119992 Москва, ул. Трубецкая, 8, стр. 2</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-0245</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Suleymanov</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сулейманов</surname><given-names>Э. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>4 Chekhova St., Grozniy 364061, Chechen Republic</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Чеченская Республика, 364061 Грозный, ул. Чехова, 4</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0493-1166</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Stilidi</surname><given-names>I. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Стилиди</surname><given-names>И. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p> 23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia </p><p>1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 23 </p><p> Россия. 117997 Москва, ул. Островитянова, 1 </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н.Н. Блохина» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГАОУ ВО «Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Ministry of Health of Chechen Republic</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Министерство здравоохранения Чеченской Республики</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff4"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-04-13" publication-format="electronic"><day>13</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-02-15"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-04-13"><day>13</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2022, Egenov O.A., Tjulandina A.S., Suleymanov E.A., Stilidi I.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2022, Егенов О.А., Тюляндина А.С., Сулейманов Э.А., Стилиди И.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Egenov O.A., Tjulandina A.S., Suleymanov E.A., Stilidi I.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Егенов О.А., Тюляндина А.С., Сулейманов Э.А., Стилиди И.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/530">https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/530</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>The aim of the work </bold>is to analyze all available literature data on the role of secondary cytoreduction, its effectiveness and safety in the recurrence of ovarian cancer (ОС) with isolated lymph node (LN) lesion.The importance and place of secondary cytoreduction in the combined treatment of recurrent ОС is one of the most controversial topics. The lesion of the LN in recurrent Ос varies from 12 % to 37 %, but an isolated recurrence in the LN is a very rare occurrence, about 5 %. The most common localization in recurrent ОС with isolated LN lesion is the paraaortic LN.</p><p><bold>The results</bold> of this literature review suggest that isolated Ln lesion should be clearly distinguished from recurrence at other sites (such as peritoneal and parenchymal), since patients with isolated recurrence in the LN have a relatively indolent course of the disease. The frequency of complete cytoreduction according to the available data of retrospective studies reaches 100 %. Paraaortic and pelvic lymph node dissection without a macroscopically detectable residual tumor in combination with postoperative systemic chemotherapy leads to improved survival rates compared only with systemic drug treatment of patients with isolated LN lesion in recurrent ОС. median survival from the moment of relapse detection and overall survival varies from about 2.5 to 4 years and &gt;5 years, respectively. Systemic paraaortic and pelvic lymph node dissection is preferable compared to selective lymphadenectomy, as it is accompanied by an increase in progression-free survival, although it doesn’t significantly prolong overall survival.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Цель работы </bold>– провести анализ имеющихся в литературе данных о роли вторичной циторедукции, ее эффективности и безопасности при рецидиве рака яичников (РЯ) с изолированным поражением лимфатических узлов (ЛУ). значение и место вторичной циторедукции в комбинированном лечении рецидива РЯ является одной из самых дискутабельных тем. Частота поражения ЛУ при рецидиве РЯ варьирует от 12 до 37 %, но изолированный рецидив в лу – очень редкое явление, его частота составляет около 5 %. Наиболее частой локализацией при рецидиве РЯ с изолированным поражением лу являются парааортальные ЛУ.</p><p><bold>Результаты</bold> этого обзора литературы показывают, что изолированное поражение ЛУ следует четко отличать от рецидивов другой локализации (таких как перитонеальный и паренхиматозный), поскольку больные с изолированным рецидивом в лу имеют относительно индолентное течение болезни. Частота полной циторедукции, согласно имеющимся данным ретроспективных работ, достигает 100 %. Парааортальная и тазовая лимфодиссекция без макроскопически определяемой остаточной опухоли в комбинации с послеоперационной системной химиотерапией приводят к улучшению показателей выживаемости в сравнении с только системным лекарственным лечением пациенток с изолированным поражением ЛУ при рецидиве РЯ. медианы выживаемости с момента выявления рецидива и общей выживаемости варьируют примерно от 2,5 до 4 лет и &gt;5 лет соответственно. Выполнение системной парааортальной и тазовой лимфодиссекции является предпочтительным по сравнению с селективной лимфаденэктомией, так как сопровождается увеличением времени без прогрессирования, хоть и существенно не повышает общую выживаемость.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>platinum-sensitive relapse</kwd><kwd>secondary cytoreduction</kwd><kwd>complete cytoreduction</kwd><kwd>incomplete cytoreduction</kwd><kwd>retroperitoneal lymph node dissection</kwd><kwd>pelvic lymph node dissection</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>платиночувствительный рецидив</kwd><kwd>вторичная циторедукция</kwd><kwd>полная циторедукция</kwd><kwd>неполная циторедукция</kwd><kwd>забрюшинная лимфодиссекция</kwd><kwd>тазовая лимфодиссекция</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tjulandin S.A., Kolomiets L.A., Morkhov K.Yu. et al. Treatment guideline for ovarian cancer/primary peritoneal cancer/fallopian tube cancer. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumors 2020:10(3s2):188–200. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тюляндин С.А., Коломиец Л.А., Морхов К.Ю. и др. Практические рекомендации по лечению рака яичников/первичного рака брюшины/рака маточных труб. Злокачественные опухоли 2020:10(3s2):188–200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Egenov O.A., Tjulandina A.S., Stilidi I.S. Surgical treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: a literature review. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Modern Oncology 2021;23(4):638–44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/18151434.2021.4.201223.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Егенов О.А., Тюляндина А.С., Стилиди И.С. Хирургическое лечение больных с рецидивами рака яичников: обзор литературы. Современная онкология 2021;23(4):638–44. DOI: 10.26442/18151434.2021.4.201223.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Elattar A., Bryant A., Winter-Roach B.A. et al. Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;10(8).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Robinson W.R., Beyer J., Griffin S. et al. Extraperitoneal metastases from recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:43–6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Uzan C., Morice P., Rey A. et al. Outcomes after combined therapy including surgical resection in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence(s) exclusively in lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:658–64. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2004.11.023.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Santillan A., Karam A.K., Li A.J. et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for isolated nodal recurrence in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:686–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Blanchard P., Plantade A., Pages C. et al. Isolated lymph node relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:41–5. DOI: 10.1016/j. ygyno.2006.06.039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Panici B., Perniola G., Angioli R. et al. Bulky lymph node resection in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17:1245–51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Fotiou S., Aliki T., Petros Z. et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients presenting with isolated nodal recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:178–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.025.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Ferrero A., Ditto A., Giorda G. et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for isolated lymph node recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:891–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.026.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Bogani G., Roberti L., Maggiore U. et al. The addition of lymphadenectomy to secondary cytoreductive surgery in comparison with bulky node resection in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143:319–24. DOI: 10.1002/ ijgo.12667.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Legge F., Petrillo M., Adamo V. et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer relapsing as isolated lymph node disease: natural history and clinical outcome. BMC Cancer 2008;8:367. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-367.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Gadducci A., Cosio S., Zola P. et al. The clinical outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer patients with apparently isolated lymph node recurrence: a multicenter retrospective Italian study. Gynecol Oncol 2010;116:358–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.11.008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Pergialiotis V., Androutsoua A., Papoutsia E. et al. Survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients treated with secondary cytoreductive surgery for isolated lymph node recurrence: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Surg 2019;69:61–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.026.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Hollis R.L., Carmichael J., Meynert A.M. et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of ovarian carcinoma displaying isolated lymph node relapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;19:30620–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.035.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Colombo N., Lorusso D., Scollo P. Impact of recurrence of ovarian cancer on quality of life and outlook for the future. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017;27:1134–40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Du Bois A., Sehouli J., Vergote I. et al. Randomized phase III study to evaluate the impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: Final analysis of AGO DESKTOP III/ENGOT-ov20. ASCO 2020. Abstr. 6000.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Zang R., Zhu J., Shi T. et al. A randomized phase III trial of secondary cytoreductive surgery in later recurrent ovarian cancer: SOC1/SGOG-OV2.ASC0 2020. Abstr. 6001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Petrillo M., Fagotti A., Ferrandina G. et al. Ovarian cancer patients with localized relapse: clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:36–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.020.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Whitney C.W., Spirtos N. Gynecologic Oncology Group surgical procedures manual. Gynecologic Oncology Group, Philadelphia, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Tu H., Huang H., Huang Q. et al. Treatment and prognostic analysis of ovarian cancer patients with isolated region of lymph node recurrence. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2012;47:928–33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Morice P., Joulie F., Rey A. et al. Are nodal metastases in ovarian cancer chemoresistant lesions? Analysis of nodal involvement in 105 patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004;25:169–74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>The Cancer Genome Atlas Investigators. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 2011;474:609–15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Patch A.M., Christie E.L., Etemadmoghadam D. et al. Whole-genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer. Nature 2015;521:489–94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Gallotta V., Bruno M, Conte C. et al. Salvage lymphadenectomy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: Analysis of clinical outcome and BRCA1/2 gene mutational status. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46(7):1327–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.035.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Maggioni A., Panici B., Dell’Anna T. et al. Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer 2006;95:699–704.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Zikan M., Fischerova D., Pinkavova I. et al. A prospective study examining the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphoceles following lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137(2):291–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Biglia N., Librino A., Ottino M.C. et al. Lower limb lymphedema and neurological complications after lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015;25(3):521–5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Tebes S.J., Sayer R.A., Palmer J.M. et al. Cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:482–7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Panici B., De Vivo A., Bellati F. et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:1136–42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Bristow R.E., Guintoli R.L., Pannu H.K. et al. Combined PET/CT for detecting recurrent ovarian cancer limited to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:294–300.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
