<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Surgery and Oncology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Surgery and Oncology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Хирургия и онкология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2949-5857</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">465</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/2686-9594-2020-10-1-43-49</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL REPORT</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Outcomes of extensive surgeries in combination treatment of stage III–IV ovarian cancer</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Результаты расширенных хирургических вмешательств при комбинированном лечении рака яичников III–IV стадии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mamazhonov</surname><given-names>Kh. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мамажонов</surname><given-names>Х. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><email>dr.hasanjon@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikogosyan</surname><given-names>S. O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Никогосян</surname><given-names>С. О.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shevchuk</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шевчук</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuznetsov</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кузнецов</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Surgical Department No. 8 (Gynecologic Oncology), N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Отделение хирургических методов лечения № 8 (онкогинекологии) ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н. Н. Блохина» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-08-29" publication-format="electronic"><day>29</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-28"><day>28</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-08-28"><day>28</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, ABV-press</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, АБВ-пресс</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">ABV-press</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">АБВ-пресс</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://onco-surgery.info/jour/about/editorialPolicies</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/465">https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/465</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Objective:</bold> to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer.</p><p><bold>Materials and methods.</bold> This retrospective study included patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer who have undergone either complete or optimal cytoreduction. Patients in the experimental group additionally had lymph node dissection, whereas patients in the control group had surgery without lymph node dissection. We evaluated 3‑year relapse-free survival (primary outcome measure), 3‑year overall survival, incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and frequency of lymph node lesions.</p><p><bold>Results.</bold> The study included 272 patients: 43 women in the experimental group and 229 women in the control group. Intraoperative complications were significantly more common in patients who had lymph node dissection compared to those who had cytoreductive surgery alone (37.2 % vs 16.6 % respectively; р = 0.0001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not vary significantly between the groups (27.9 % in the experimental group vs 16.2 % in the control group; р = 0.128). Thirty-three patients (76.7 %) were found to have metastasis in the lymph nodes excised. The three-year overall survival rate was 82.6 % among patients who had lymph node dissection and 75.7 % among patients who had no lymph node dissection (р = 0.306). The three-year relapse-free survival rate was 26.2 % in the experimental group and 38.4 % in the control group (р = 0.858).</p><p><bold>Conclusions.</bold> Systemic lymph node dissection does not improve long-term outcomes and increases the incidence of intraoperative complications in patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer undergoing complete or optimal cytoreduction.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Цель исследования</bold> – изучить непосредственные и отдаленные результаты выполнения лимфодиссекции у больных раком яичников III–IV стадии.</p><p><bold>Материалы и методы.</bold> В ретроспективный анализ включены данные больных раком яичников III–IV стадии, которым была выполнена полная или оптимальная циторедукция. В исследуемой группе дополнительно проводили лимфодиссекцию. Основным оцениваемым параметром была 3‑летняя безрецидивная выживаемость. Дополнительно оценивали 3‑летнюю общую выживаемость, частоту интра- и послеоперационных осложнений, частоту поражения лимфатических узлов.</p><p><bold>Результаты.</bold> В исследуемую группу было включено 272 пациентки: 43 в группу хирургического лечения с лимфодиссекцией и 229 в группу хирургического лечения без лимфодиссекции. Интраоперационные осложнения достоверно чаще отмечены в группе с лимфодиссекцией: у 37,2 % пациенток по сравнению с 16,6 % (р = 0,0001). Частота послеоперационных осложнений достоверно не различалась между исследуемыми группами: 27,9 % в группе с лимфодиссекцией и 16,2 % в контрольной группе (р = 0,128). Поражение метастазами опухоли удаленных лимфатических узлов отмечено у 33 (76,7 %) пациенток. Трехлетняя общая выживаемость составила 82,6 % в группе с лимфодиссекцией и 75,7 % в группе без лимфодиссекции (р = 0,306), 3‑летняя безрецидивная выживаемость – 26,2 % в группе с лимфодиссекцией и 38,4 % в группе без лимфодиссекции (р = 0,858).</p><p><bold>Выводы.</bold> Систематическое выполнение лимфодиссекции не приводит к улучшению отдаленных результатов лечения у больных раком яичников III–IV стадии, которым была проведена полная или оптимальная циторедукция, но служит причиной досто- верного повышения числа интраоперационных осложнений.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак яичников III–IV стадии</kwd><kwd>лимфодиссекция</kwd><kwd>полная циторедукция</kwd><kwd>оптимальная циторедукция</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Harter P., Sehouli J., Lorusso D. et al. A randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian neoplasms. N Engl J Med 2019;380(9):822–32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808424.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Panici P.B., Maggioni A., Hacker N. et al. Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(8):560–6. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Zhou J., Shan G., Chen Y. The effect of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016;46(8):718–26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L. et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250(2):187–96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chang S.J., Bristow R.E., Ryu H.S. Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;126(3):381–6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Legge F., Petrillo M., Adamo V. et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer relapsing as isolated lymph node disease: natural history and clinical outcome. BMC Cancer 2008;8:367. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-367.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Blanchard P., Plantade A., Pages C. et al. Isolated lymph node relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104(1):41–5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Berek J.S. Lymph node-positive stage IIIC ovarian cancer: a separate entity? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(Suppl 2):S18–20. DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bf8111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Gasimli K., Braicu E.I., Nassir M. et al. Lymph node involvement pattern and survival differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 ovarian cancer patients after primary complete tumor debulking surgery: a 10-year retrospective analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(4):1279–86. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4959-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Sahin H., Meydanli M.M., Sari M.E. et al. Does the primary route of spread have a prognostic significance in stage III non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer? J Ovarian Res 2018;11(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0393-0.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
