Predictive model for assessing probability of breast cancer biological subtype change during treatment

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Breast cancer demonstrates significant biological heterogeneity, which determines disease prognosis and the choice of systemic therapy. In clinical practice, the molecular subtype of the tumor is traditionally considered a relatively stable characteristic; however, recent data indicate the possibility of its change during the course of treatment. Investigation of patterns of tumor biological transformation represents an important area of personalized oncology, as such changes may influence the efficacy and appropriateness of the administered therapy.

Aim. To develop a multiparametric prognostic model integrating histological, immunohistochemical, and clinical data for predicting changes in the molecular subtype of breast cancer.

Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 261 patients with histologically verified invasive breast cancer treated between 2006 and 2025 at the "Medical City" Multidisciplinary Clinical Medical Center (Tyumen). Depending on the presence or absence of a change in the tumor molecular subtype, defined as a change in the immunohistochemical subtype between sequential examinations, patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients with confirmed subtype change; group 2 – patients without subtype change.

Results. The developed prognostic model demonstrated AUC (area under curve, 0.779 (95 % confidence interval 0.71–0.82) with specificity of 85 % and sensitivity of 51 % at the standard cut-off threshold (> 0.5). With optimized threshold of p = 0.32, sensitivity of the model reached 72.4 %, specificity – 71.3 %. Internal bootstrap validation (1000 repetitions) confirmed stability of the model: AUC 0.79 (95 % confidence interval 0.72–0.86). To improve predictive accuracy, additional machine learning methods were applied (Random Forest: AUC 0.79, F1 0.77; LASSO: AUC 0.81, F1 0.78), which confirmed robustness of the identified predictors and consistency of prognostic estimates.

Conclusion. Changes in the molecular subtype of breast cancer are a predictable event. The developed model enables identification of patients at high risk of tumor biological transformation, which may help optimize dynamic monitoring and ensure timely adjustment of therapeutic strategies.

About the authors

M. S. Shvedskiy

Туumen State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: Shvedsky99@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8854-2773
Russian Federation, 54 Odesskaya St., Tyumen, 625023

R. I. Tamrazov

Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: Shvedsky99@gmail.com
Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow, 127006

E. A. Gaysina

Туumen State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: Shvedsky99@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7262-3819
Russian Federation, 54 Odesskaya St., Tyumen, 625023

References

  1. Filho A.M., Bray F., Soerjomataram I. et al. The GLOBOCAN 2022 cancer estimates: data sources, methods, and a snapshot of the cancer burden worldwide. Int J Cancer 2025;156(7):1336–46. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35278
  2. Тюляндин С.А., Артамонова Е.В., Жигулев А.Н. и др. Рак молочной железы. Malignant tumours 2023;13(3):157–200. doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-157-200 Tyulyandin S.A., Artamonova E.V., Zhigulev A.N. et al. Breast cancer. Malignant tumours 2023;13(3):157–200. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-157-200
  3. Januškevičienė I., Petrikaitė V. Heterogeneity of breast cancer: the importance of interaction between different tumor cell populations. Life Sci 2019;239:117009. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117009
  4. Prasetyanti P.R., Medema J.P. Intra-tumor heterogeneity from a cancer stem cell perspective. Mol Cancer 2017;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0600-4
  5. Meacham C.E., Morrison S.J. Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 2013;501(7467):328–37. doi: 10.1038/nature12624
  6. Harris L.N., Ismaila N., McShane L.M. et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(10):1134–50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2289
  7. Goldhirsch A., Wood W.C., Coates A.S. et al. Strategies for subtypes – dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011;22(8):1736–47. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr304
  8. Perou C.M., Sørlie T., Eisen M.B. et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000;406(6797):747–52. doi: 10.1038/35021093
  9. Dieci M.V., Barbieri E., Piacentini F. et al. Discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer has a prognostic impact: a single-institution analysis. Ann Oncol 2013;24(1):101–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds248
  10. McGranahan N., Swanton C. Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future. Cell 2017;168(4):613–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018
  11. Harbeck N., Gluz O. Neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer. Breast 2017;34(2):99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.038
  12. De La Cruz L.M., Moody A.M., Tappy E.E. et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer subtype: does subtype change and, if so, how? Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25(12):3535–40. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6737-0
  13. Schrijver W.A.M.E., Suijkerbuijk K.P.M., van Gils C.H. et al. Receptor conversion in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2018;67:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.05.002
  14. Jin X., Jiang Y.Z., Chen S. et al. Prognostic value of receptor conversion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a prospective observational study. Oncotarget 2015;6(11):9600–11. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3372
  15. Turashvili G., Brogi E. Tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer. Front Med 2017;4:227. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00227
  16. Li C., Fan H., Xiang Q. et al. Prognostic value of receptor status conversion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;176(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05421-7
  17. Qi G., Zhang X., Gai X., Yan X. Retrospective analysis of ER, PR, HER2, Ki67 changes and their clinical significance between primary breast cancer and metastatic tumors. Peer J 2024;12:e17377. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17377
  18. Denkert C., Rachakonda S., Karn T. et al. Dynamics of molecular heterogeneity in high-risk luminal breast cancer – from intrinsic to adaptive subtyping. Cancer Cell 2025;43(2):232–47.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2025.01.002

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-press

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77-85909 от  25.08.2023.