Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: short-term outcomes
- Authors: Umirzokov A.S.1, Korshak A.V.1, Korchagina S.N.1, Zhuykov V.N.2, Egorov V.I.1,3,4, Kantieva D.M.1, Savchenko I.V.1, Moiseenko A.V.2, Polyakov A.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
- Kazan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- M.Z. Sigal Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Ministry of Health Care of Tatarstan Republic
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 21-31
- Section: ORIGINAL REPORT
- Published: 15.03.2026
- URL: https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/903
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2026-16-1-21-31
- ID: 903
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not included in standard treatment protocols for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
Aim. To compare immediate treatment outcomes in ICC patients receiving NACT versus surgery alone.
Materials and methods. The retrospective analysis included patients who underwent surgery for ICC between 2010 and 2024. NACT-related complications were assessed using CTCAE v.5.0, treatment response was evaluated per the RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the impact of NACT on postoperative complications and likelihood of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) completion were analyzed.
Results. The surgery-only (control) group included 108 patients, while the NACT group included 49 patients. Grade III NACT-related complications developed in 2 (4.4 %) patients. Partial response (PR) to NACT was observed in 5 (10.2 %) patients, with stable disease was achieved in 40 (81.6 %) patients. R0 resection was achieved in 91 (84.3 %) patients in the surgery-only group and 47 (95.9 %) in the NACT group (p = 0.113). NACT did not affect the risk of severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio 0.482; 95 % confidence interval 0.183–1.268; p = 0.139). Patients receiving NACT completed ACT more frequently compared to control group: 76 (70.4 %) versus 43 (87.8 %), respectively (p = 0.026).
Conclusion. NACT demonstrated high safety but low PR rates and no impact on R0 resection achievement probability.
About the authors
A. Sh. Umirzokov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9126-3153
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. V. Korshak
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-8236-2808
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
S. N. Korchagina
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-9275-4556
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
V. N. Zhuykov
A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1143-6654
Russian Federation, 70 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg, 197758
V. I. Egorov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Kazan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; M.Z. Sigal Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Ministry of Health Care of Tatarstan Republic
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6603-1390
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522; 49 Butlerova St., Kazan, 420012; 29 Sibirskiy Trakt, Kazan, 420029
D. M. Kantieva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3953-0036
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
I. V. Savchenko
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2142-661X
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. V. Moiseenko
A.M. Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1011-4533
Russian Federation, 70 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg, 197758
Aleksandr N. Polyakov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.alexp@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5348-5011
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
References
- Yang Z., Jiang X. Efficacy and safety comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery for treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2023;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02754-y
- Breder V.V., Abdurakhmanov D.T., Bazin I.S. et al. Malignant tumors of the liver and biliary system. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumors 2025;15(3s2-1.1):414–63. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2025-15-3s2-1.1-17
- Benson A.B., D’Angelica M.I., Abrams T. et al. Biliary tract cancers, version 2.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2025;23(9):403–18. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.0042
- Liu Y., Wu C., Huang Q. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2025;25(1):1757. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-15203-8
- Elemosho A., Chatzipanagiotou O.P., Angez M., Pawlik T.M. Comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgical resection versus upfront surgery for potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2026;30(1):102263. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102263
- Freites-Martinez A., Santana N., Arias-Santiago S., Viera A. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE – version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) 2021;112(1):90–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009
- Sterling R.K., Lissen E., Clumeck N. et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology 2006;43(6):1317–25. doi: 10.1002/hep.21178
- Ayabe R.I., Paez-Arango N., Estrella J.S. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – does pathologic response mean better outcomes? HPB (Oxford) 2023;25(4):472–80. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.011
- Wehrle C.J., Chang J., Woo K. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy reduces node positivity but does not confer survival benefit versus up-front resection for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2024;130(3):453–61. doi: 10.1002/jso.27743
- Van Treeck B.J., Olave M.C., Watkins R.D. et al. Neoadjuvant therapy leads to objective response in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2024;26(7):938–48. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.04.003
- Wu G., Chen X., Luo R. et al. Histopathologic grading of residual tumor predicts survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy: major pathologic response and its clinical significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2025;49(6):578–87. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002359
- Buettner S., Koerkamp B.G., Ejaz A. et al. The effect of preoperative chemotherapy treatment in surgically treated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients – a multi-institutional analysis. J Surg Oncol 2017;115(3):312–8. doi: 10.1002/jso.24524
- Le Roy B., Gelli M., Pittau G. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2018;105(7):839–47. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10641
- Riby D., Mazzotta A.D., Bergeat D. et al. Downstaging with radioembolization or chemotherapy for initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27(10):3729–37. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08486-7
- Sutton T.L., Billingsley K.G., Walker B.S. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2021;221(6):1182–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.02.029
- Parente A., Kamarajah S.K., Baia M. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma: a national population-based comparative cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 2023;27(4):741–9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05606-y
Supplementary files

