Cholangiocellular carcinoma associated with liver cirrhosis and recurrent esophageal variceal bleeding: a clinical case
- Authors: Dedov A.V.1, Sikorskaya Y.N.2, Bekov M.R.2, Savishchev A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Astrakhan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- S. M. Kirov City Clinical Hospital No. 3
- Issue: Vol 16, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 108-115
- Section: CASE REPORT
- Published: 15.03.2026
- URL: https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/882
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2026-16-1-108-115
- ID: 882
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare primary liver malignancy accounting for 10–15 % of hepatic cancers. Diagnosis of this condition in the setting of cirrhosis is challenging and is often established posthumously.
Clinical case. A 47-year-old male patient with chronic alcohol abuse and hepatitis C seropositivity presented with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding on March 18, 2025. Child–Pugh class B cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and esophageal varices (grade II–III) were diagnosed. Ultrasonography showed multiple focal liver lesions suggestive of malignancy. The patient failed to comply with oncology consultation and continued his previous lifestyle. Over the subsequent 7-month period, the patient experienced four episodes of massive variceal hemorrhage requiring intensive hemostatic therapy and massive blood transfusions. Successful endoscopic variceal ligation was performed during the third admission. Death occurred during the fourth hemorrhagic episode (October 4, 2025). Autopsy and histopathological examination revealed cholangiocarcinoma of the intrahepatic bile ducts (International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) code C22.1) with multiple hepatic metastases on a background of mixed-etiology micro-macronodular cirrhosis (hepatitis C virus + chronic alcohol intoxication).
Conclusion. This case illustrates diagnostic challenges of detecting cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhotic patients, progressive severity of recurrent variceal hemorrhages, and natural progression of untreated disease. It emphasizes the importance of active cancer surveillance, morphological verification, and the high effectiveness of endoscopic variceal ligation.
About the authors
Aleksey V. Dedov
Astrakhan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: dedov1965.d@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4806-0144
Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases
Russian Federation, 121 Bakinskaya St., Astrakhan, 414000Yu. N. Sikorskaya
S. M. Kirov City Clinical Hospital No. 3
Email: dedov1965.d@yandex.ru
Gastroenterology Department
Russian Federation, 2 Khibinskaya St., Astrakhan, 414038M. R. Bekov
S. M. Kirov City Clinical Hospital No. 3
Email: dedov1965.d@yandex.ru
Surgery Department No. 1
Russian Federation, 2 Khibinskaya St., Astrakhan, 414038A. V. Savishchev
Astrakhan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: dedov1965.d@yandex.ru
Department of Pathological Anatomy
Russian Federation, 121 Bakinskaya St., Astrakhan, 414000References
- Razumilava N., Gores G.J. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2014;383(9935):2168–79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61903-0
- Banales J.M., Cardinale V., Carpino G. et al. Expert consensus document: cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;13(5):261–80. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.51
- Altemeier W.A., Gall E.A., Zinninger M.M., Hoxworth P.I. Sclerosing carcinoma of the intrahepatic (hilar) bile ducts. AMA Arch Surg 1957;42(1):8–16. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1957.01280150140015
- Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med 1965;38(2):241–56. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(65)90178-6
- Dedov A.V., Mustafin E.A., Polukhina O.A. On the difficulties of diagnosis and complications of Klatskin tumor (literature review, clinical case, discussion). Astrahanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Astrakhan Medical Journal 2023;18(2):110–9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29039/1992-6499-2023-1-110-119
- Bergquist A., von Seth E. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015;29(2):221–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.02.003
- Sripa B., Kaewkes S., Sithithaworn P. et al. Liver fluke induces cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Med 2007;4(7):e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040201
- Rizvi S., Khan S.A., Hallemeier C.L. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma – evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018;15(2):95–111. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.157
- Bridgewater J., Galle P.R., Khan S.A. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2014;60(6):1268–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.021
- Nakanuma Y., Sato Y., Harada K. et al. Pathological classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a new concept. World J Hepatol 2010;2(12):419–27. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i12.419
- Nakanuma Y., Klimstra D.S., Zen Y. et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC, 2019. Pp. 254–259.
- Tyson G.L., El-Serag H.B. Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2011;54(1):173–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.24351
- Khan S.A., Tavolari S., Brandi G. Cholangiocarcinoma: epidemiology and risk factors. Liver Int 2019;39(Suppl 1):19–31. doi: 10.1111/liv.14095
- Shaib Y.H., El-Serag H.B., Davila J.A. et al. Risk factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a case-control study. Gastroenterology 2005;128(3):620–6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.048
- Vilchez V., Shah M.B., Daily M.F. et al. Long-term outcome of patients undergoing liver transplantation for mixed hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: an analysis of the UNOS database. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.10.001
- Hennedige T.P., Venkatesh S.K. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, staging and treatment monitoring. Cancer Imaging 2012;12(3):530–47. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0044
- Lim J.H. Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(3):819–27. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810819
- Chung Y.E., Kim M.J., Park Y.N. et al. Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2009;29(3):683–700. doi: 10.1148/rg.293085729
- Nakanuma Y., Kakuda Y., Uesaka K. et al. Pathology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2016;5(6):445–53. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.12.08
- Garcia-Tsao G., Abraldes J.G., Berzigotti A., Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2017;65(1):310–35. doi: 10.1002/hep.28906
- De Franchis R.; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015;63(3):743–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022
- European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018;69(2):406–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024
- Tripathi D., Stanley A.J., Hayes P.C. et al. UK guidelines on the management of variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. Gut 2015;64(11):1680–704. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309262
- Ivashkin V.T., Maevskaya M.V., Pavlov Ch.S. et al. Clinical guidelines of the Russian Society for the Study of the Liver and the Russian Gastroenterological Association for the treatment of complications of liver cirrhosis. Rossiyskiy zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii, koloproktologii = Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Proctology 2016;26(4):71–102. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-4-71-102
- Sarin S.K., Kumar A., Angus P.W. et al. Diagnosis and management of acute variceal bleeding: Asian Pacific Association for Study of the Liver recommendations. Hepatol Int 2011;5(2):607–24. doi: 10.1007/s12072-010-9236-9
Supplementary files

