Systemic drug therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: treatment results from real clinical practice
- Authors: Gutorov S.L.1, Anokhin A.Y.1,2, Tikhomirova T.E.1, Mesropova Y.M.1, Zarenkova A.K.1, Mikhaleva V.Y.1, Popova V.E.1, Rumyantsev A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 67-74
- Section: ORIGINAL REPORT
- Published: 20.06.2026
- URL: https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/822
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2026-16-2-67-74
- ID: 822
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Currently, adjuvant chemotherapy of choice after surgical treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma is doxorubicin. The same approach is used for the 1st line of systemic drug therapy in patients with initially metastatic process, or those who have not previously received adjuvant treatment with anthracyclines. Disseminated forms of metastatic leiomyosarcoma are characterized by unfavorable prognosis, and the options for potentially effective drug treatments are limited.
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of 1st and 2nd line chemotherapy regimens for uterine leiomyosarcoma in a population of patients in real clinical practice.
Materials and methods. The retrospective analysis included 43 patients with histologically verified uterine leiomyosarcoma. The study included patients with primarily localized forms of the disease, who underwent surgical treatment at the 1st stage (with or without adjuvant chemotherapy), and patients with initially metastatic disease. All patients had a history of 1–2 lines of systemic drug therapy due to disease progression.
Results. The analysis included 43 patients who underwent treatment at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology between 2021 and 2024. The efficacy of the 1st line was assessed in 35 (81.4 %) patients: the objective response rate reached 17.6 %, and median progression-free survival from the start of the 1st line was 7.4 months. The efficacy of 2nd line of therapy was assessed in 18 (41.9 %) patients: the objective response rate was 11.1 %, median progression-free survival from the start of the 1st line to progression after the 2nd line was 13.2 months, and median progression-free survival from the start of the 2nd line to progression after it was 3.3 months.
Conclusion. Analysis of the efficacy of systemic drug therapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma in real clinical practice demonstrates comparable long-term treatment results with data from international literature. Further study of the efficacy of combined adjuvant and 1st line therapy regimens seems promising.
About the authors
S. L. Gutorov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5912-1155
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. Y. Anokhin
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8981-5748
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522; Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119048
T. E. Tikhomirova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7313-4013
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
Y. M. Mesropova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7779-2109
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. K. Zarenkova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3095-0088
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
V. Y. Mikhaleva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-5602-0062
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
V. E. Popova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-7747-7314
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
A. A. Rumyantsev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: anokhinaleks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4443-9974
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow, 115522
References
- Yang Q., Madueke-Laveaux O., Cun H. et al. Comprehensive review of uterine leiomyosarcoma: pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and targeted therapy. Cells 2024;13(13):1106. doi: 10.3390/cells13131106
- Chen S., Deng Y., Zhai Y. et al. Clinical analysis and prognostic prediction model for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma at FIGO stage I. Int J Womens Health 2023;2023(15):545–57. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s406381
- Seagle B., Sobecki-Rausch J., Strohl A. et al. Prognosis and treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma: a National Cancer Database study. Gynecol Oncol 2017;145(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.012
- Розонова О.А., Артамонова Е.В., Козлов Н.А. Лекарственное лечение лейомиосарком матки. Онкогинекология 2019;4(32):35–44. doi: 10.52313/22278710_2019_4_35 Rozonova O.A., Artamonova E.V., Kozlov N.A. Drug treatment of uterine leiomyosarcomas. Onkoginekologiya = Oncogynecology 2019;4(32):35–44. (In Russ.). doi: 10.52313/22278710_2019_4_35
- Scurr M. Histology-driven chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2011;12(1):32–45. doi: 10.1007/s11864-011-0140-x
- Нечушкина В.М., Коломиец Л.А., Кравец О.А. и др. Рак тела матки и саркомы матки. Злокачественные опухоли 2024;14(3S2-1):165–88. doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-263-279 Nechushkina V.M., Kolomiets L.A., Kravets O.A. et al. Uterine cancer and uterine sarcomas. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumors 2024;14(3S2-1):165–88. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-263-279
- Nagase Y., Matsuo K., Nakao Y. et al. Adjuvant therapy de-escalation for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2024;191:219–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.018
- Seddon B., Strauss S., Whelan J. et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(10):1397–410. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30622-8
- Zivanovic O., Leitao M., Iasonos A. et al. Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(12):2066–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8366
- D’Ambrosio L., Touati N., Blay J. et al. Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, or doxorubicin alone as a first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma: a propensity score matching analysis from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Cancer 2020;126(11):2637–47. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32795
- García-Del-Muro X., López-Pousa A., Maurel J. et al. Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(18):2528–33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.6107
Supplementary files

