Efficiency of chemotherapy GemCap + mitotane as second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic adrenocortical cancer
- Authors: Zhulikov Y.A.1, Kovalenko E.I.1, Bokhyan V.Y.1,2, Khoroshilov M.V.1, Goryainov D.A.1, Roslyakova A.A.3, Magamedova S.S.1, Evdokimova E.V.1, Artamonova E.V.1,4
-
Affiliations:
- N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 12, No 3 (2022)
- Pages: 36-42
- Section: ORIGINAL REPORT
- Published: 07.09.2022
- URL: https://onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/551
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-3-36-42
- ID: 551
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Combination of gemcitabine, metronomic capecitabine and mitotane (GemCap + m) is the most studied regimen in second and subsequent lines of therapy for advanced adrenocortical cancer (ACC). Previously published studies do not give a definitive answer to the question- what plays a key role in realizing the response to treatment: chemotherapy or mitotane in therapeutic concentration.
Aim. Evaluation the efficacy and safety of GemCap + m combination with the standard dosing regimen of capecitabine in patients with metastatic ACC.
Materials and methods. This retrospective single-center clinical study included patients over 18 years of age with histologically confirmed ACC with disease progression after completion of platinum-containing therapy. They received chemotherapy regimen gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 for days 1, 8 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally 2 times at days 1–14 of the 21-day cycle with mitotane. we evaluated objective response, stabilization of disease, 6-months disease control rate and median progression-free and overall survival. Radiological assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was carried out every 6–8 weeks of treatment.
Results. The study included 25 patients. mitotane concentration above 14 ng/mL was achieved in 22 (88 %) patients, of which 21 (84 %) reached therapeutic concentration in previous treatment lines. 80 % of patients received treatment as 2nd line, 20 % as 3rd and subsequent lines. The objective responses and disease stabilization was observed in 1 (4 %) and 11 (44 %) of patients, respectively. Disease control for at least 6 months rate was 24 %. median progression-free and overall survival were 3.2 months and 12.17 months, respectively. Toxicity grade 3–4 was observed in 28 % of patients. gemcitabine dose reductions due to thrombocytopenia grade 1–2 were required in 2 cases (8 %), no capecitabine reductions were necessary.
Conclusion. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a new dose regimen of chemotherapy GemCap + m in the second and subsequent lines of therapy for metastatic ACC. The progression of the disease against the background of previous lines of therapy at a therapeutic concentration of mitotane in the majority of patients indicates the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic component of gemCap in a cohort of patients resistant to platinum and mitotane.
Keywords
About the authors
Ya. A. Zhulikov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: fyarikzhulikov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4108-439X
Yaroslav Аndreevich Zhulikov
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationE. I. Kovalenko
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4763-7992
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationV. Yu. Bokhyan
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9066-5190
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997
Russian FederationM. V. Khoroshilov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3770-5173
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationD. A. Goryainov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4205-9556
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationA. A. Roslyakova
National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1857-5083
11 Dmitriya Ulyanovа, Moscow 117292
Russian FederationS. S. Magamedova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2014-586X
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationE. V. Evdokimova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5574-9970
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationE. V. Artamonova
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: fake@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7728-9533
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
Russian FederationReferences
Supplementary files


